Sorry, politics again.
Like Doctor Whos of the modern era, the Prime Minister has changed yet again. It’s the tenth Prime Minister since I’ve been alive – that’s an average of just under five years each, although of course there have been two long-players amongst them. (Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker, obviously.)
I can remember as a child hearing on the news that Jim Callaghan was leaving. (He was my third Prime Minister, whose appearance later changed after he confronted the giant spiders of Metebelis Three – and no, I won’t be getting bored of this tiresome comparison anytime soon, sorry). Other than a name and a face on the news, and what with my being not quite eight at the time, I didn’t know much about him. Not even which lot he was leader of.
But regardless of the detail, I knew he was leaving what seemed to be a pretty important job – it had to be, based on how often he appeared on TV (usually just after Grandstand and before The Generation Game). So in my political naivete I had sympathetic visions of the poor guy having to get up in the morning to go and find another job. Would he, I wondered, be on the bins by next week?
That, of course, isn’t quite how it works – some four decades on, I’ve learned from simple observation that, post-Downing Street, there’s plenty of opportunities for an ex-PM. The lecture circuit, the book deal, ludicrously high fees for ludicrously low hours in consultation or as a board member to some favoured company.
What I didn’t know until today, which is why in fact I’ve hardly mentioned Boris and haven’t even mentioned Brexit at all is that there is in fact a thing called, ‘The Public Cost Duty Allowance’.
I was already aware that the ‘golden handshake’ when you go from being an MP to suddenly not being an MP any more is rather more generous than it would be if, say, I were to go in to work on Monday and find myself given the boot – and only recently I was ranting about the over-generous allowance for maternity leave. But what I didn’t realise was that there is the aforementioned allowance “to assist former Prime Ministers with the costs of continuing to fulfil duties associated with their previous position in public life.”
It’s newsworthy today because as my brother has pointed out on Facebook, Nick Clegg has (a) managed to have the point stretched to include deputy Prime Ministers such as, just to give one example, just off the top of my head, such as himself; and (b) accordingly claimed £113,000.
I’ve put in the bit about Nick Clegg partly to have a moan and partly to give a paragraph of thinking time, to try and derive some meaning from the phrase that ended the one before, because I’m not sure what duties former Prime Ministers have to fulfil, which are associated with their previous position.
I can believe that an ex-PM gets a lot of invitations to open this, join that, speak at such and such, and whatever – but in most instances those are going to be paid engagements; and besides, they’re not to do with their role as PM, it’s just basking in the residual chutzpah of having been PM.
That is to say: how can there be a role of ‘ex-PM’ when the duties of the role are being carried out by the new PM? If they want to go off and do this, that or the other, fine carry on, but I’m struggling to see why the rest of us are subsidising it. Is it like having a wife, but keeping a mistress?!
However it works, it seems more than generous – in respect of the newest ex-PM, I think the second ever female Prime Minister is extremely lucky that we’ll be keeping her in the manner to which she’s become accustomed.
As for Mr Callaghan, at least now I know why he wasn’t emptying our bins the following week. He of course was famously followed by the first ever female Prime Minister.
You know, the one with the long scarf and the robot dog…