Quick disclaimer:
it’s not about the sitcom, sorry. (Not this time anyway.)
For the record,
though, I’m currently eight seasons in, so just two more to go before Netflix
pulls the plug at the end of the year. It seems to have become fashionable in
some quarters to proclaim how rubbish it is, but all I can say is that I’m
still enjoying it. In fact the pen-penultimate season eight episode (it could
have been called, but isn’t, The One Where Rachel Will Do Anything, And I Mean
Anything, To Induce The Baby) made me laugh out loud – a lot. (Is LOL-AL a
thing?)
As it happens,
though, Friends is a good example (oh! maybe it is about the sitcom
after all) of the ‘group of friends’ scenario (hence the name of the show, obviously)
which is so beloved of TV and film makers. Since I wouldn’t want anybody to
think that all I do is watch fondly-remembered television comedies from the
nineties, let me say that yesterday evening, in a dramatic change of pace I
watched Four Weddings and a Funeral which is an entirely different kettle
of fish. (It’s a fondly-remembered FILM comedy from the nineties).
Four Weddings,
like Friends, like How I Met Your Mother (another favourite),
revolves around a group of (mostly) unrelated but closely connected friends,
who seemingly do everything together to the exclusion of anybody else. So, for
example, the six friends always meet at Monica’s for Thanksgiving rather than,
which I suspect would be far more likely in the real world, independently visiting
their various families.
It’s an unrealistic
set-up but devilishly appealing, this idea of a miscellaneous group of friends
so closely-knit that they would do anything for each other. We don’t really
need a detailed explanation of James Fleet’s comment that “nansy’s in residence,
might knock us up a plate of eggs and bake over a late-night scrabble” to get
the sense of its warm, comfortable, laugh-filled fellowship. Mr Curtis pulls
the same trick (but, spoiler alert, not as well) in the not-quite-a-sequel Notting
Hill which is nevertheless worth a watch even though you may find yourself
pining for a wedding partway through. (Or a funeral.)
Making closer-than-close
friendships seems all very easy in delightfully-mannered British films, or in fondly-remembered
US comedies – or in Primary School, where you could pretty much form a lasting
bond of friendship simply by asking, “do you want to be friends?” It’s far more
complicated as a grown-up.
Or maybe that’s just
me. Almost certainly, I suspect, in that I do find it a bafflingly elusive
thing to do, forming friendships as an adult. That’s not to say that I’m unfriendly,
at least I don’t think I am, but that’s not quite the same as being, and as
being able to be, friendly.
My wife, on the
other hand, she is willing and able to be friendly with anyone. On reflection,
I’m concerned that the previous sentence sounds like a bitter euphemism for
‘slut’ so let me clarify, and quickly. It’s almost impossible for us, for example,
to pop out to the shops without Mrs C sparking up a conversation with some passing
stranger: often about dogs; sometimes about the difficulties, and the graphically
described side-effects, of being lactose-intolerant; and occasionally about how
annoying her husband is.
It’s (presumably) lovely
to be so out-going and, yes, friendly. And although I’m not, I’m fortunate enough
when we’re out together that I seem friendly by association. It’s a bit like
David Duchovny’s comment on his character in The X Files that Scully is Mulder’s
‘human credential’, making his seeming lack of humanity or friendliness acceptable.
So I suppose my wife and I are like that, she’s the human face to my
awkwardness, like Mulder and Scully but without the official label of sexiest
woman in the world and minus the passionate obsession with mysterious alien hybrid/government
conspiracy shenanigans.
Goodness knows,
really, how my wife puts up with me (assuming she still does after being
variously labelled a slut and NOT the sexiest woman on the planet, in recent sentences).
I guess she’s just a
really good friend.