Number Ten, Number Nine

As if things weren’t bad enough, now David Cameron has a book out.

I can’t imagine how tedious a book it is, presumably part misplaced-smugness, part retrospective justification for his actions – arguably the only time when it might get insightful is when Brexit kicks off, but of course that happens after he’s already sodded off so presumably the book ends just when things might be in danger of getting interesting.

Not only that, it would seem he can’t even be trusted to keep his mouth shut and has been happy to blab all about supposedly confidential discussions. The minute I saw the headline, of his revealing details of private conversations between him and the Queen, I thought he’d get into trouble for it. (I’m pleased to say that very shortly after, he did.)

Maybe I’m being too hard on him; or maybe a man who, to be frank, was happy to hold a referendum regardless of any damage it might do, not out of any principle but simply to make sure he won an election, deserves not to be especially well-regarded. To make it worse, the moment it all blows up in his face he is able to swan off entirely scot-free, with no recriminations and not even an offer to help sort out the mess he’s left behind. Through gritted teeth, let me say that the final insult is that not only has he got away with it, he’s also secured a no doubt six-figure book deal out of it.

Curiously enough, another book came out the exact same day, another autobiography. Unlike Cameron’s, though, I’d actually like to read Christopher Eccleston’s book – although I suspect it would be hard to convince anybody that I’m not just interested in the Doctor Who stuff.

That’s not to say there isn’t still a fascination in discovering, or deciphering, just what happened, just what went wrong in 2004 that he left Doctor Who after just one year. You could draw the parallel that he too left just as things were getting interesting – but in Chris Eccleston’s case he left things in a healthier state than he’d found them, and since then has shown nothing but tact, discretion and dignity.

The tantalising hints and tidbits that have emerged over the years suggest a falling-out, artistic or personal or both, from which the production team’s relationships never really recovered; with the situation then being made worse by the BBC’s extraordinarily clumsy response when the news broke that Eccleston had already left the show, after only one of his thirteen episodes had aired.

I feel weirdly conflicted whenever I hear Christopher Eccleston talk, even obliquely, about that time. There’s an understandable frustration and resentment on his part at being, in effect, cold-shouldered and hung out to dry by the Beeb, even as his performance was giving them a hit show. I love Doctor Who, the BBC too for that matter, but that affection makes me feel disloyal to a man who inspires loyalty. No, not loyalty exactly – it’s more that in every interview I’ve seen or read of him, he comes across as a man of high standards, of fierce and unbending integrity. And with that comes, somehow, the implicit challenge to try and match up.

An insightful friend, years ago, wrote on a forum that he thought Christopher Eccleston might be like Patrick Troughton – in that, it wouldn’t be until a whole generation later that he would begin to realise how much he meant to us. Now he’s emerged from the silence which has surrounded his time as the Doctor; and at last, it seems, he is becoming aware of, and coming to terms with, the great regard and fondness in which he is still held.

Mind you, I don’t think the book is about Doctor Who as such, it’s much more his life story, his struggles and demons and relationships. Not like Cameron, not looking to justify his actions or put a good spin on his legacy; but to say, plainly and truthfully, here I am, this is me, I don’t always find it easy.

He really does sound like one of the good guys.

Fantastic, even.

La La La

I’m not really into music.

This probably becomes clear when I say that the first single I ever bought was The Smurf Song; and the fact that one of the biggest surprises of my life came in my early twenties, when I discovered that not everybody likes ABBA, makes it clear that the punk revolution entirely passed me by.

Nevertheless, even I know this weekend is Glastonbury – if only because Radio 2 has spent the past week telling us so. Its our channel of choice at work, meaning that the days pass by to a background of Zoe Ball in the morning, through Ken Bruce and his legendary Popmaster, followed by the constantly surprising and occasionally controversial Jeremy Vine (generally giving us something to chew over at lunchtime). Then it’s Steve Wright in the afternoon (inspiring a rush of nostalgia for my late-80s A-Level years, when he performed exactly the same role but on Radio 1) and finally we end up with Sara Cox in the teatime slot.

If I leave work particularly late, I catch a bit of Jo Whiley’s early evening show from 7pm onwards. It is, if I’m honest, a bit of an acquired taste and not really my bag – because as opposed to the daytime shows, it isn’t entirely made up of well-known popular music. Rather, it determinedly and laudably champions new music too. That probably makes it inevitable, given my ‘not into music/Smurfs/who could possibly not enjoy deceptively complex cod-English Swedish pop stylings’ opening, that it doesn’t do much for me. (Although, the other week I must admit I caught the very end of Jo’s show when to my delight she played Perry Como’s For The Good Times which took me instantly back to 1975 when my Mum had it on double LP.)

So although I’m clearly not a Glastohead  (if that’s the word (if that’s a word)) I am aware that it’s on, I’m aware that Kylie was appearing on the Legend Stage on Sunday, and that Stormzy headlined on Friday night. In the interests of full disclosure, and once again I refer you to my ‘not into music’ credentials, I’ll have to admit that although I know all those things almost as a matter of rote after having heard it so many times this past week, I don’t actually know who one of those people is. (And it’s not the one who married Jason Donovan in Neighbours.)

Conversely, Jo Whiley is clearly a fervent Glastonburyer (is that the word?) and she made the point one evening this week (not sure which, although clearly one where I left work particularly late) that for those who aren’t one bit interested in the whole Glastonbury thing, it is only for one week out of the broadcasting year, so why not just let those who enjoy it get on and enjoy it.

She makes a good point (and by crikey she does a good show, even if it’s not for me). There is a tendency, a need even, that some people have, to poopoo things that others enjoy. Maybe it’s the inevitably polarising effect of social media that makes it seem more prevalent nowadays, but as soon as somebody tweets [other social media platforms are available] how much they enjoy a film/sport/Somerset-based internationally-famous musical festival event, they will get replies that say they love it too OR that they absolutely hate it. (The vast swathe of middle-ground opinion, the ‘I can take it or leave it’ crowd doesn’t get much of an airing – because, I guess, if you don’t have any strong feeling one way or the other, why would you waste time telling anybody?)

I don’t enjoy Wimbledon, I can’t stand the Olympics or the World Cup, and clearly I’m no Glastonaut (that can’t be it?). But I don’t go around saying that (well, except in this paragraph apparently). We all like different things, and rather than raining on each other’s parades, we should try letting each other indulge our passions when the opportunity arises, rather than criticise or complain.

Although, obviously, if you don’t like ABBA, well… there must be something wrong with you, surely?

No News Is Not Good News…?

It’s not been a great week for the BBC.

I don’t mean the hugely disappointing last episode of Line of Duty, although mother o’God the already-commissioned sixth season will need to go some to restore its reputation.

No, I mean things like Thursday’s sacking of Danny Baker, an extraordinary example of a stupid action being met with an even more stupid reaction. (This modern trend of a kneejerk response driven by the outrage of the online mob is a very scary thing – and although it seems to be largely a ‘celebrity’ thing at the moment, what do we do if one day it’s us the mob is outraged by?)

The Baker furore, though, had settled down enough to be made light of in the announcement the following day, of the decision to pull Have I Got News For You? at the last minute. The reason given was that Change UK’s leader Heidi Allen was on the show, and because we are now into the European Election Campaign, that breaches the Beeb’s impartiality rules.

There has of course been a backlash >ahem< the outrage of the online mob >ahem< with people pointing out that Nigel Farage was on Question Time only the day before. As if in some way a politician appearing alongside three other politicians in a political debate talking about political issues… is the same as a comedy news quiz.

It’s not. And although it probably reflects badly on our society, a public figure’s reputation can be dealt a considerable blow, or given a huge boost, by a ‘simple’ appearance on a light-entertainment show. Boris Johnson’s otherwise-inexplicable popularity, for example, is in no small part due to appearances as a baffled but entertaining minor political figure on Have I Got News For You?

So unquestionably, Heidi Allen’s reputation would either have been enhanced or… um… or the opposite of enhanced. And whichever way that bias went, it could be legitimately pointed at as being unfair. (Of course, one might argue that even a non-appearance has done her profile some good, as until yesterday I had never even heard of her, and certainly didn’t know she was the leader of the Change party!)

The trouble in these ‘personality politics’ days, especially with figures as divisive as Mr Farage, is that his detractors too often come across as attacking the person, rather than  his views. And because they do it so often…

Well, it’s as though they’ve never heard of the Boy who cried Wolf. Or even its modern-day remake, the Democrats who cried Trump.

Despite their fervent hopes, and although not quite the whole-hearted exoneration the President claims, the Mueller Report has not uncovered any ‘smoking guns’. As far as the electorate is concerned, it’s done – if we’ve already heard enough about it at a distance of however wide the Atlantic Ocean is, how much more fed up is the average US voter by now? The Democrats need to stop raking over the election of three years ago, and start focussing on the one happening next year – their approach ought to be why people should vote for their candidate and NOT why people shouldn’t vote for Trump. Sadly it doesn’t look like that’s where they’re going, which means even more sadly they’re probably losing the next election as we speak.

Similarly, hopping back across the pond, vocal opponents of Farage run the risk of putting people’s backs up when they complain even at his presence on a TV show. It could be argued that he appears quite a lot (I’ve name-checked him three times already myself) but you could counter-argue that there aren’t all that many members of the Brexit party to choose from, so the odds are that when it is represented, it’s going to be by him.

Stuck in the middle, then, is the poor BBC. Accused of obvious far-right pro-Brexit bias AND of blatant lefty Remainer liberalism. I’m famously no expert on politics, but if the BBC is managing to annoy all sides, I’d say that’s a reasonable indication that it’s being even-handed and fair to all parties.

Unless you’re a middle-aged DJ with some monkey pictures, obviously.