Sam Smith has confused me.
After reading this https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-49688123 I foolishly googled gender, so it’s my own fault really. I’m not so out of touch that I wasn’t prepared to discover there are more than two – but I was still taken aback at just how many more than two there (allegedly) are.
This isn’t one of those “there were only two in the old days, modern life is silly, bloody snowflakes, etc” trips, and I’m not going all “fings ain’t what they used to be” either. But when one site is listing twenty or more genders (the BBC is citing “more than a hundred”) I’m left scratching my head in bewilderment.
Actually, though, you know what, that’s fine. It’s fine. I mean, don’t we all just want to be allowed to get on with our lives in peace? So, if Sam Smith wants to be a ‘they’ from now on, that’s fine. Up to a point.
It’s both a very easy and a very difficult move for somebody in the entertainment industry, in the public eye. I’m not saying Smith walking up the red carpet in high heels wouldn’t attract some comment, but it would be less inflammatory than some chartered accountant doing the same thing at the annual Hemel Hempstead Dinner Dance. So that’s easier.
On the other hand, given that the announcement has made the news in a way that a random tweet from an unknown home counties bean counter wouldn’t, it’s a brave move. Because if anybody now uses the wrong pronoun in respect of Sam Smith, chances are that it is deliberate rather than accidental. Meaning every time, the decision on whether or not to call people out on it. Sounds exhausting.
But…
Smith is quoted as saying, “I’m not male or female” and “I do think like a woman sometimes” but… how can Smith possibly know that? Surely we only ever feel what we feel. It’s like debating the colour of a post box – we all call it pillar box red, but we can’t ever be certain that we are all seeing the same colour. Similarly, how can anybody know that what they’re feeling is ‘different’ to feeling like a ‘normal’ male or female?
Depending on your point of view, I’m lucky or uninformed or just plain dull, in that I’m male in both anatomy and inclination and, in as far as I would ever feel the need to use this sentence (which is never so far) I identify as male. But I can’t definitively say that what I feel when I say I feel male, is what anybody else would call male if they felt it.
There’s another, niggling element to this. You can only have a vast range of genders on the spectrum IF at either extreme you have ‘full male’ and ‘full female’. We’ve spent I-don’t-know-how-many decades striving for equality, evangelising that women can go out to work and drink in pubs and that men can look after babies and cry at musicals. But you can’t agree with that AND have a strict ‘this is what it means to be male/female’ as a benchmark on the gender scale… and if you don’t have that, if being male (or female) can be anything from a boxer to a flower arranger, then you don’t need any other genders.
Once you have a hundred labels for something they start to become meaningless. Not to mention nonsensical. If I was a teenage girl with a picture of Sam Smith, the object of my teenage affection, on my bedroom wall, then this time last week I’d have been comfortable in my heterosexuality. But now, suddenly, I fancy somebody who isn’t male. Does that mean I’m now something else too…? No. Of course not. Because, sorry, but that’s clearly nonsense.
If I’m honest it makes my head spin just trying to get a handle on it all. The only real certainty is that it’s very, very complicated. So who knows, maybe the BBC is right. Maybe Sam Smith is right too.
I think they are wrong.